Verified facts
The numbers
- In the 2023-24 Civil Rights Data Collection, 19 school districts in states that prohibit corporal punishment reported students struck, totalling 418 students; 380 of those come from one New Jersey district whose ratio of instances to students, 4.4, is roughly three times that of any state where corporal punishment is lawful.
- In the 2021-22 school year, 24,534 K-12 public school students received corporal punishment in the United States, according to the federal Civil Rights Data Collection.
- In the 2023-24 school year, 19,851 K-12 public school students received corporal punishment, computed by this project from the raw Civil Rights Data Collection file released August 31, 2026; the Office for Civil Rights has published no analysis of that release.
- Students receiving corporal punishment in US public schools fell from 106,055 in 2013-14 to 92,479 in 2015-16, 69,492 in 2017-18, about 19,400 in the pandemic year 2020-21, and 24,534 in 2021-22.
- In 2021-22, 948 school districts (5.4 percent of the nation's 17,704) and 2,050 schools (2.1 percent) reported at least one student receiving corporal punishment.
- The federal count of corporal punishment is self-reported by districts and, in the Department of Education's own words, 'likely underreported'; it counts students, not incidents, and skips virtual schools.
States and the law
- 196 states are party to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child; the United States, which signed it in 1995, is the only UN member state that has not ratified it.
- Seven federal circuits allow a student to sue over excessive corporal punishment under substantive due process ('shocks the conscience'), two under the Fourth Amendment, and the Fifth Circuit alone, covering Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, denies any federal claim where state remedies exist; the Supreme Court has declined to review that rule five times, most recently in January 2024.
- Colorado prohibited corporal punishment in public schools and licensed child care on April 20, 2023 through HB23-1191, which passed the House 48-16 and the Senate 32-0.
- Five states prohibit corporal punishment of students with disabilities while still permitting it for other students: Louisiana (2017), Tennessee (2018, with a parental-permission exception), Arkansas (2019, four categories), Mississippi (2019) and Oklahoma (2025).
- The Protecting Our Students in Schools Act, which would bar corporal punishment in any school receiving federal funds, was introduced as H.R. 3265 on May 8, 2025 with 21 cosponsors, all Democrats, and referred to the House Education and Workforce Committee; no version since 2010 has had a hearing or markup, and as of September 2026 no Senate companion has been introduced in the 119th Congress despite press releases saying one would be.
- Since July 1, 2025, Florida districts that allow corporal punishment must obtain parental consent, either for the school year or before each instance, under HB 1255 (the statute says 'consent,' not 'written consent'; the second-adult and written-explanation rules predate it in § 1003.32), which passed both chambers unanimously on final votes and was signed May 30, 2025.
- Idaho banned corporal punishment and chemical restraint in public and charter schools on April 3, 2023 through House Bill 281, a restraint-and-seclusion bill carried by a Republican sponsor; it passed the House 45-22 and the Senate 21-12.
- In Ingraham v. Wright (1977), a 5-4 Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment does not apply to corporal punishment in public schools and that due process does not require a hearing before paddling because state tort and criminal remedies suffice; it expressly left open whether excessive corporal punishment violates substantive due process.
- New Mexico prohibited corporal punishment in schools through HB 172, signed by Republican Governor Susana Martinez on April 6, 2011 after passing the House 36-31 and the Senate 22-17.
- Oklahoma's SB 364, prohibiting corporal punishment of students with disabilities, became law in May 2025 without Governor Kevin Stitt's signature after passing the Senate 31-16 and the House 63-25.
- Three states now require a parent's affirmative consent before a school may paddle a child: Missouri (written permission, 2022), Louisiana (annual written consent on a state form, 2023) and Florida (consent for the year or per instance, 2025); Kentucky reached the same rule by regulation in 2022 and every district then quit.
- Five states prohibit corporal punishment in private schools as well as public: New Jersey, Iowa, Maryland (HB 185, 2023), New York (Chapter 551, 2023) and Illinois (Public Act 103-0806, effective January 1, 2025).
- South Carolina's only statute on the subject, § 59-63-260, unchanged since 1973, says the governing body of each school district 'may provide corporal punishment for any pupil that it deems just and proper,' with no limits, and no bill to change it was filed in the 2023-24 or 2025-26 sessions.
- As of September 2026, corporal punishment in public schools is legal by statute in 17 states; in two of them, Kentucky and North Carolina, every district has prohibited it by policy, leaving 15 where it is both legal and in use.
- Texas HB 772, which would have banned corporal punishment in public schools, failed on second reading in the House on April 26, 2023 by a reported 58-86; its sponsor, Rep. Alma Allen, has filed the bill every session for 18 years.
- Wyoming's statute does not authorize corporal punishment outright; it grants school staff civil and criminal immunity for 'reasonable corporal discipline' authorized by board policy, and bills to repeal that immunity failed in the House in 2023 (12-47) and failed introduction in 2026 (38-24, short of two-thirds).
Campaigns that worked
- Kentucky recorded zero instances of corporal punishment in the 2023-24 school year after all 171 school districts adopted prohibiting policies by November 2, 2023, driven by a state board regulation rather than a statute.
- All 115 North Carolina school districts had prohibited corporal punishment by October 2, 2018, when Graham County became the last to vote to end it, although state law (G.S. 115C-390.4) still permits it.
The research
- No study has found that ending corporal punishment increases misbehavior, and no study has found that using it improves behavior; as of September 2026 there is no US natural-experiment study of suspensions or achievement before and after a state or district ban.
- In a 2021 fMRI study of 147 children, those who had been spanked showed greater prefrontal activation to fearful faces, a pattern the authors compared to more severe maltreatment.
- Across 88 countries and 403,604 adolescents, countries with full bans on corporal punishment had lower rates of frequent physical fighting (69 percent of the no-ban rate for boys, 42 percent for girls), and countries with school-only bans had less fighting among girls.
- In a three-year study of 658 children, only physical abuse predicted declines in cognitive performance, but every form of physical punishment, including mild corporal punishment, predicted declines in school engagement.
- A 2016 meta-analysis of 75 studies covering 160,927 children found spanking significantly associated with 13 of 17 outcomes examined, every one in the direction of harm and none in the direction of benefit, including aggression (d = .37), mental health problems (d = .53) and later victimization by physical abuse (d = .64).
- In a propensity-matched survey of more than 800 young adults from the 19 states where school corporal punishment was legal, those who had received it in school had lower high-school GPAs, more depressive symptoms, and greater intention to spank their own children.
- A 2022 meta-analysis specific to school corporal punishment found it associated with more externalizing behavior (r = .27, 21 studies, 67,400 children), more internalizing problems (r = .16) and lower school performance (r = −.11, 20 studies, 977,367 children).
What works instead
- A 2016 meta-analysis of 54 controlled studies found classroom management programs improved students' academic, behavioral and social-emotional outcomes with an average effect of g = 0.22, with programs focused on social-emotional development contributing most.
- Free, federally produced guides cover every practice in the training: the What Works Clearinghouse practice guide on reducing elementary behavior problems (2008), the Center on PBIS practice guides, and the Department of Education's 2023 Guiding Principles, which contains a section titled 'Ending the practice of corporal punishment in schools.'
- Children randomized to classrooms using the Good Behavior Game in first and second grade had, by ages 19 to 21, significantly lower rates of drug and alcohol disorders, regular smoking and antisocial personality disorder, with the largest effects among boys who were most aggressive in first grade.
- In a five-year randomized trial across 37 Maryland elementary schools, School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports reduced suspensions and office referrals, and children in PBIS schools were 33 percent less likely to receive an office discipline referral.
- In a two-year randomized trial in 44 Pittsburgh schools, restorative practices cut days lost to suspension by 36 percent against 18 percent in control schools and narrowed racial disparities, but academic outcomes worsened in grades 6 to 8, arrests did not fall, and a second randomized trial in 13 Maine middle schools found no significant effects.
- A 2019 Campbell systematic review of trauma-informed approaches in schools found no studies that met its inclusion criteria; whole-school trauma-informed programs had no rigorous outcome evidence as of 2017.
The rest of the world
- The United Kingdom ended corporal punishment in state schools by statute in 1986, New Zealand by statute in 1990, Canada by a 2004 Supreme Court ruling, South Korea by a 2011 national decree after provincial ordinances, and Australia state by state between 1983 and 2019.
- Seventy states have prohibited corporal punishment of children in all settings, including the home.
- Of the 38 OECD countries, corporal punishment in schools is fully prohibited in 36; the exceptions are the United States and Australia, where Queensland has no statutory ban for non-government schools.
- Corporal punishment is fully prohibited in schools in 137 of the 199 states and territories tracked by the Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children; in 62 it is not.
Who has taken a position
- The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry's 2012 policy statement does not support corporal punishment as a method of behavior modification and urges its members to advise school boards accordingly.
- The American Academy of Pediatrics' 2018 policy statement on discipline concludes that aversive strategies including all forms of corporal punishment are minimally effective in the short term and not effective in the long term.
- In August 2023 the American Academy of Pediatrics published a policy statement recommending that corporal punishment in all school settings be abolished in all states by law and replaced by alternative forms of behavior management.
- The American Federation of Teachers has no resolution opposing school corporal punishment; its only resolution on the subject (1976) intervened in Ingraham v. Wright to protect 'a teacher's right to maintain discipline in the classroom,' though the AFT endorsed the federal Protecting Our Students in Schools Act in 2023.
- The American Psychological Association adopted a resolution in February 2019 opposing physical discipline of children by parents, citing the 2016 meta-analysis; it does not address school corporal punishment directly.
- The National Association of School Psychologists 'strongly opposes the use of corporal punishment in schools and supports ending its use in all schools' (position statement, revised 2021).
- National PTA's position statement says it will support efforts to abolish corporal punishment and to develop alternative discipline programs.
- In November 2016 more than 100 organizations, including the ACLU, APA, AFT, NEA, AAP, NAACP, SPLC and the Children's Defense Fund, signed an open letter organized by the National Women's Law Center calling for an end to corporal punishment in schools.
Courts
- In October 2023 a Texas judge dismissed the assault charge against an Overton ISD principal who had paddled a student hard enough to leave bruising a child-abuse physician called consistent with abuse, because district policy was followed and the mother was present and consenting.
Templates
Placeholders are in [BRACKETS]. Facts cited inside the templates come from the registry above.
School District Policy
Placeholders are in [BRACKETS]. Facts cited in this template are maintained in facts/claims/; check facts/README.md for the current figures before sending.
POLICY: PROHIBITION OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENT Policy Number: [NUMBER] Adopted: [DATE] [DISTRICT NAME] School District I. PURPOSE The Board of Education recognizes that maintaining a safe, supportive learning environment requires effective discipline strategies that do not rely on physical punishment. II. POLICY STATEMENT Corporal punishment is prohibited in all schools and programs operated by the [DISTRICT NAME] School District. No employee, volunteer, or contractor shall inflict corporal punishment on any student. III. DEFINITION Corporal punishment means the intentional infliction of physical pain upon a student's body as a disciplinary measure. This includes, but is not limited to: paddling, spanking, slapping, or any other form of physical punishment. IV. EXCEPTIONS This policy does not prohibit the use of reasonable physical intervention necessary to: - Protect a student or others from imminent physical harm - Obtain possession of a weapon or dangerous object - Protect property from serious damage - Maintain order when other means have failed V. ALTERNATIVE DISCIPLINE STRATEGIES The District shall provide training to all staff on positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS), restorative practices, and other evidence-based discipline strategies. VI. VIOLATIONS Any employee who violates this policy shall be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. VII. REPORTING Any incident involving physical contact with a student for discipline purposes must be documented and reported to the building principal within 24 hours. Approved by the Board of Education on [DATE].
Letter to School Principal
Placeholders are in [BRACKETS]. Facts cited in this template are maintained in facts/claims/; check facts/README.md for the current figures before sending.
Dear Principal [NAME], I am the parent of [CHILD'S NAME], a student at [SCHOOL NAME]. I am writing to formally request that my child NOT receive corporal punishment under any circumstances. I do not consent to any school employee using physical discipline on my child. Please place this letter in my child's file and ensure that all staff who interact with my child are aware of this request. If there are any behavioral issues, I ask that you contact me directly so we can work together on an appropriate response. I am also requesting information about: 1. The school's current discipline policy 2. Any forms required to opt out of corporal punishment 3. The discipline procedures that will be used for my child instead Please confirm receipt of this letter and let me know if you need any additional information. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, [YOUR NAME] [ADDRESS] [PHONE NUMBER] [EMAIL] Parent/Guardian of [CHILD'S NAME] Student ID: [IF APPLICABLE]
Letter to School Board
Placeholders are in [BRACKETS]. Facts cited in this template are maintained in facts/claims/; check facts/README.md for the current figures before sending.
Dear Members of the [DISTRICT NAME] Board of Education, I am writing to request that the Board adopt a policy prohibiting corporal punishment in our schools. While [STATE] state law permits corporal punishment, individual districts have the authority to ban it. [NUMBER] of the [TOTAL] districts in our state have already done so, including [NEIGHBORING DISTRICT], recognizing that physical punishment is ineffective and harmful. As a [parent/community member/educator] in this district, I am concerned that: - Corporal punishment can cause physical and psychological harm to children - Research shows it is no more effective than alternative discipline methods - It exposes the district to potential liability - It creates a climate of fear rather than a positive learning environment I urge the Board to: 1. Place this issue on an upcoming meeting agenda for discussion 2. Direct staff to research policies from districts that have banned corporal punishment 3. Adopt a policy prohibiting corporal punishment in all district schools and programs I would welcome the opportunity to speak at a Board meeting on this issue or to provide additional information. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, [YOUR NAME] [ADDRESS] [EMAIL/PHONE]
Letter to State Legislator
Placeholders are in [BRACKETS]. Facts cited in this template are maintained in facts/claims/; check facts/README.md for the current figures before sending.
Dear [REPRESENTATIVE/SENATOR NAME], I am writing to urge you to support legislation banning corporal punishment in [STATE] public schools. [STATE] is one of 17 states whose law still allows a school employee to hit a student as punishment, and one of 15 where it is actually used. Of the 38 OECD countries, 36 prohibit it in schools. The facts are clear: - Corporal punishment does not improve student behavior more effectively than other methods - It is associated with increased aggression, anxiety, and lower academic achievement - It falls hardest on boys (81 percent of students struck) and on Black students (26 percent of students struck, 15 percent of enrollment), according to the US Department of Education's 2021-22 data - Every major medical and educational organization opposes it [NUMBER] students in our state received corporal punishment in [YEAR], according to the federal Civil Rights Data Collection. Each of them deserves the protection students in 33 other states already have. Banning corporal punishment protects students, reduces liability for schools, and aligns our state with best practices in education. It costs nothing to implement and has been successfully adopted by states across the political spectrum. I respectfully ask that you: 1. Support legislation to ban corporal punishment in public schools 2. Advocate for this issue with your colleagues 3. Meet with me to discuss this important matter Thank you for your service to our community. Sincerely, [YOUR NAME] [ADDRESS] [EMAIL/PHONE]
When a district says it has no written policy
Some districts answer a policy request with "we don't have one." In a permitting state that means the practice runs on custom: nothing prohibits it, nothing governs it, and the district has reported using it. That is the opening, not the end of the conversation. The reply below offers the district a way to close the gap on its own terms: a model policy, the replacement curriculum in training/, and coaching through the change, all free, framed around the goals the district already publishes (safety, attendance, achievement, a climate parents trust). Send it as the reply to their "no". It is an in-kind grant: EarthPilot.org funds and delivers the work, the district pays nothing, and no cash changes hands. Say so in those words; the value must be derivable from a rate card.
Subject: Re: Request for your district's corporal punishment policy Thank you for the straight answer. A district without a written policy on this is more common than people think, and it puts the district in a hard spot: the practice is on the federal record for [DISTRICT] ([N] students in 2023-24), and there is nothing on paper that says who may do it, when, how, or how a parent can decline. Your district is eligible for the Safe Discipline Program grant: an in-kind grant funded and administered by EarthPilot.org, at no cost to the district and with no cash changing hands. It provides: - a model board policy, drafted to your state's law and your board's format, in either direction the board chooses: governing the practice with parental consent and limits, or replacing it; - a replacement discipline curriculum for staff (ten short modules, evidence-cited, built for small schools), which the district may adopt in whole or in part; - implementation coaching for the superintendent and principals through the first year, including the board presentation and the parent letter. There is no cost and no obligation. The aim is to align what the district does with what it says it wants for its students — [QUOTE THE DISTRICT'S OWN MISSION OR GOAL LINE HERE]. If that is useful, reply and I will send the model policy for [STATE] and a one-page outline of the program. If the board would rather start with the policy alone, that is fine too. [NAME] EarthPilot · earthpilot.org/kids · [EMAIL]
Op-Ed Template
Placeholders are in [BRACKETS]. Facts cited in this template are maintained in facts/claims/; check facts/README.md for the current figures before sending.
HEADLINE: It's Time for [STATE/DISTRICT] to End Corporal Punishment in Schools Today, a student can still be legally hit by a teacher in [STATE]. It's time for that to change. Corporal punishment, usually paddling with a wooden board, remains legal in 17 states and in use in 15. [STATE] is one of them. In [YEAR], [NUMBER] students in our state received it, according to the US Department of Education. The evidence against corporal punishment is overwhelming. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association, and every major medical organization oppose it. Research shows it doesn't work better than other methods - and causes real harm. Students who experience corporal punishment show higher rates of aggression, anxiety, and depression. They have lower academic achievement and are more likely to drop out. And it falls unevenly: nationally, Black students are 15 percent of enrollment and 26 percent of students struck, and boys are four of every five. [SHARE A LOCAL STORY OR STATISTIC] Some argue corporal punishment is necessary to maintain discipline. But 33 states and 36 of the 38 OECD countries have banned it, and their schools did not descend into chaos. Kentucky's last district stopped in 2023 and the state recorded zero incidents the next year. This is not a partisan issue. Idaho banned it in 2023 with a Republican sponsor; New Mexico's ban was signed by a Republican governor as a parental-rights measure. [STATE/DISTRICT] should join them. Our children deserve schools where they feel safe - where they're taught that problems are solved through communication, not violence. It's time for [STATE/DISTRICT] to end corporal punishment once and for all. [YOUR NAME] is a [TITLE/DESCRIPTION] in [CITY].
Public records request for district corporal punishment records
Every state has a public records law. This request asks for the records that show how often a district uses corporal punishment and on whom, without any student's identity. Send it to the district's records custodian (usually the superintendent's office); the district website often names the officer. Cite your state's statute in the first line: data/states/<XX>.yaml lists it under records_law where known.
[DATE] [DISTRICT NAME] Attn: Public Records Officer [ADDRESS] Re: Public records request under [STATE PUBLIC RECORDS STATUTE] Dear Records Officer: Under [STATUTE], I request copies of the following records for the [YEAR] and [YEAR] school years: 1. The district's current board policy and any administrative regulation or handbook section governing corporal punishment, including any parental consent or refusal form. 2. Aggregate counts, by school, of incidents of corporal punishment administered, and of students who received corporal punishment, with any breakdown the district maintains by grade, sex, race, and disability status. I am not requesting any personally identifiable student information; please redact as required by FERPA rather than withhold. 3. Any log, register, or report form the district requires to be completed when corporal punishment is administered, in blank, and the count of such forms completed per school. 4. Any complaint, claim, or notice of claim submitted to the district regarding corporal punishment, with personal information redacted. 5. The district's submission to the US Department of Education Civil Rights Data Collection for the most recent collection, limited to the corporal punishment items. I request electronic copies. If any portion is withheld, please cite the specific exemption and release the remainder. If fees will exceed $[AMOUNT], please contact me before proceeding. Please acknowledge receipt within the time required by [STATUTE]. Sincerely, [NAME] [EMAIL] [PHONE]
School Board Resolution
Placeholders are in [BRACKETS]. Facts cited in this template are maintained in facts/claims/; check facts/README.md for the current figures before sending.
RESOLUTION OF THE [DISTRICT NAME] BOARD OF EDUCATION PROHIBITING CORPORAL PUNISHMENT Resolution No. [NUMBER] WHEREAS, research consistently demonstrates that corporal punishment is ineffective as a discipline strategy and may cause physical and psychological harm to students; and WHEREAS, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association, the National Education Association, and other professional organizations oppose the use of corporal punishment in schools; and WHEREAS, corporal punishment disproportionately affects students of color and students with disabilities; and WHEREAS, effective alternative discipline strategies exist that promote positive behavior without physical punishment; and WHEREAS, the Board of Education is committed to providing a safe, supportive learning environment for all students; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the [DISTRICT NAME] Board of Education hereby: 1. Prohibits the use of corporal punishment by any employee, volunteer, or contractor in any school or program operated by the District; 2. Directs the Superintendent to develop policies and procedures implementing this resolution within 60 days; 3. Directs the Superintendent to provide training on alternative discipline strategies to all staff; 4. Commits to reviewing discipline data annually to ensure equitable treatment of all students. ADOPTED this [DAY] day of [MONTH], [YEAR]. _______________________________ Board President _______________________________ Board Secretary
State-Level Ban
Placeholders are in [BRACKETS]. Facts cited in this template are maintained in facts/claims/; check facts/README.md for the current figures before sending.
AN ACT relating to student discipline in public schools.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF [STATE]:
SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENT
(a) No person employed by or volunteering for a public school district shall inflict or cause to be inflicted corporal punishment upon a student.
(b) For purposes of this section, "corporal punishment" means the deliberate infliction of physical pain as a means of discipline, including but not limited to:
(1) Paddling, spanking, or hitting;
(2) Slapping or striking;
(3) Any other form of physical punishment.
(c) This section shall not prohibit:
(1) The use of reasonable physical force necessary to maintain order and control in a school or classroom setting;
(2) The use of reasonable physical force necessary to quell a disturbance threatening physical injury to persons or damage to property;
(3) The use of reasonable physical force necessary for self-defense or the defense of others;
(4) The use of reasonable physical force necessary to obtain possession of a weapon or other dangerous object within a student's control;
(5) The use of reasonable physical force necessary to protect a student from self-harm.
SECTION 2. ENFORCEMENT
(a) Each school district shall adopt policies prohibiting corporal punishment consistent with this Act within 90 days of the effective date.
(b) Violations of this section may result in disciplinary action against the employee, up to and including termination.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit a parent's right to pursue civil remedies.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Act shall take effect on [DATE].Written and oral testimony for a legislative committee
Committees read written testimony and hear two to five minutes of oral testimony. Written testimony should be one to two pages, cite sources, and be submitted through the committee's portal before the deadline. Oral testimony should be the first paragraph plus the ask.
Testimony of [NAME], [TITLE/AFFILIATION] [COMMITTEE], [CHAMBER], [STATE] Legislature In support of [BILL NUMBER], [DATE] Chair [NAME] and members of the committee: [STATE] is one of [NUMBER] states in which a public school employee may legally strike a student as punishment. In the [YEAR] school year, [NUMBER] students in [STATE] received corporal punishment according to the US Department of Education's Civil Rights Data Collection. [DISPARITY SENTENCE WITH FIGURE, IF VERIFIED FOR THE STATE.] Why this bill: [TWO SENTENCES ON WHAT THE BILL DOES.] What the evidence says: [THREE SENTENCES, EACH WITH A CITATION FROM facts/claims/. Use the AAP 2018 policy statement, the Gershoff & Grogan-Kaylor 2016 meta-analysis, and the state's own CRDC numbers.] What replaces it: [NUMBER] of our [TOTAL] districts have already ended the practice. They rely on school-wide positive behavior supports and restorative practices, which are already in the state's [MTSS / discipline framework] and supported by federal Title IV-A funds. A free, open implementation guide is available at [training/ URL]. The cost of inaction: liability. [CITE A SETTLEMENT OR SUIT IN THE STATE OR CIRCUIT FROM data/states/<XX>.yaml OR strategy/case-studies/.] I urge the committee to report [BILL NUMBER] favorably. Respectfully, [NAME] [CONTACT]
Public comment at a school board meeting
Most boards allow three minutes. That is about 400 words. Say who you are, one number, one story that is yours to tell, and one ask.
Good evening. My name is [NAME]. I am a [parent of a student at SCHOOL / teacher / pediatrician / taxpayer] in this district. I am here about corporal punishment. Our district's policy [POLICY CODE] still allows an employee to hit a student with a board. According to the federal Civil Rights Data Collection, [NUMBER] students in this district received corporal punishment in [YEAR]. [If applicable: Federal data also show that Black students and students with disabilities in this district were paddled at [X] times the rate of their classmates.] [ONE STORY, 60 SECONDS: your child, your classroom, your practice. No other family's child.] The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association, and the National Education Association all oppose this practice. [NUMBER] of the [TOTAL] districts in [STATE] have already ended it, including [NEIGHBORING DISTRICT], and their schools did not fall apart. They use the same positive-behavior and restorative approaches our teachers are already trained in. I am asking the board to do three things. First, put a policy revision to end corporal punishment on next month's agenda. Second, until then, direct staff to honor every parent's written refusal without exception. Third, publish our discipline data by school on the district website every year. Thank you. I have left copies of the data and a model policy with the clerk.
Strategy, training, and the rest
- Theory of change and playbooks: district, state, narrowing, replacement, federal, persuasion.
- Case studies: Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Kentucky's regulation, North Carolina, Florida's consent law, Oklahoma, Wyoming, the federal bills.
- Every argument for paddling heard in testimony, and what has answered it.
- Liability: what courts actually do, including the Fifth Circuit rule.
- The training: ten modules for replacing corporal punishment in a small school, against 48 sources.
- Share kits: images in the visual language of the communities that still paddle.